Optimistic a few beneficial consequence within the 2021 meeting polls in West Bengal scheduled to be held in April-Might, state Bharatiya Janata Celebration president Dilip Ghosh has already began chalking out plans to oust the ruling Trinamool Congress in additional than 100 civic our bodies.
Ghosh, who was re-elected the Bengal BJP president on January 16, 2020, has requested social gathering staff to extend mass contact with individuals in all 107 municipalities throughout the state.
The social gathering is specializing in all of the 144 wards in Kolkata Municipal Company with a transparent narrative that the BJP can run the KMC extra successfully than the Trinamool Congress.
The BJP has additionally began engaged on report playing cards of TMC councillors to focus on their failures. The social gathering will underscore the dengue menace within the metropolis moreover alleged poor infrastructure of municipality-run faculties and healthcare centres, and sanitation work.
Within the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, the saffron social gathering stumped the TMC by successful a formidable 18 of the 42 seats on provide in Bengal.
With vital positive factors within the state forward of the meeting elections and with excessive hopes of successful, the BJP is now additionally eyeing the civic polls which it feels will decide its precise power within the state.
Political strategists say that the meeting and civic polls will maybe be chief minister Mamata Banerjee’s hardest problem to retain her citadel.
Previously 5 years, the BJP has made seen inroads in Bengal and the social gathering below the management of Dilip Ghosh has not solely managed to wrest 18 Lok Sabha seats (in comparison with a mere two seats in 2014) from the ruling TMC, it has additionally completed properly in practically 51 out of 144 wards below the KMC.
In the course of the 2019 parliamentary polls, when political specialists had been busy analysing the performances of assorted political events, particularly the BJP and TMC, in Bengal, researchers within the saffron camp had motive to cheer as voting patterns steered that in South and North Kolkata, the BJP took the lead in practically 26 wards. Considerably, this included ward quantity 82 in Chetla which belongs to mayor Firhad Hakim of the Trinamool.
In January 2019, Hakim gained a by-election from Chetla by securing practically 76.82 per cent votes. In 2010, he gained from the identical ward with practically 72 per cent votes. His scale of victory was large towards the BJP’s Jiban Sen who may handle solely 11.95 per cent votes.
However within the Lok Sabha elections a number of months later, Firhad’s social gathering colleague Mala Roy (Kolkata South candidate) managed to take a lead by round 1,000 votes solely from this section.
Probably the most vital was Mamata Banerjee’s personal ward quantity 73. On this ward, as per voting patterns through the basic elections, the BJP was forward by practically 490 votes.
TMC additionally has trigger for fear in ward numbers 58, 85 and 93. Whereas ward quantity 58 belongs to senior mayor-in-council member Swapan Samaddar, ward numbers 85 and 93 belong to Debasish Kumar and Ratan De respectively. In all of the three wards, the social gathering did not safe a lead.
Additionally, not less than three borough TMC chairpersons — Sandip Bakshi, Ratan Malakar and Susanta Ghosh — additionally trailed of their respective wards.
Senior TMC chief and social gathering MP Sudip Bandopadhyay additionally trailed in eight of the 11 wards at Jorasanko in Kolkata North Lok Sabha constituency. In Jadavpur, the ruling TMC trailed in 4 wards.
Dilip Ghosh has claimed on a number of events that the Trinamool is frightened of holding the civic polls as a result of Mamata Banerjee is aware of that her social gathering will face a humiliating loss.
In 2015, the TMC had gained 114 wards out of a complete 144 below KMC. The Left events had gained 15, whereas the BJP and Congress had gained 7 and 5 respectively.
That yr, polling was held in 91 municipalities throughout the state and the TMC managed to win 71.
The State Election Fee (SEC) has drafted a reservation record for the civic polls which signifies that 4 member mayors-in-council (MMiCs) – Swapan Samaddar (surroundings and basti improvement), Ratan Dey (roads), Baiswanor Chatterjee (housing) and Debabrata Majumder (strong waste administration) – and two borough chairmen of the KMC won’t be able to contest from their very own wards.
As per the SEC’s draft, eight out of the KMC’s 144 wards have come below Scheduled Caste (SC) reservation together with three for SC girls. A complete of 45 wards have been reserved for the final girls class.
On October 1, 2020, the West Bengal BJP demanded the rapid intervention of the State Election Fee in conducting elections in additional than 107 municipalities and companies.
Alleging that the TMC authorities is deliberately delaying the ballot course of, the state BJP has written a letter to the Bengal ballot panel, whereas pointing to the Supreme Courtroom’s order (dated September 22, 2020), which sought the state EC’s opinion on how quickly the pending elections might be performed.
Earlier, the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom had additionally noticed that the elections needs to be held as quickly as attainable.
State BJP vice chairman Jay Prakash Majumdar in his letter to the ballot panel had talked about, “There’s a travesty within the West Bengal State Election Fee Act in regards to the accountability of fixing the date of elections. Whereas the state authorities is empowered by the Act to finalise the dates of native physique elections, the SEC is obliged to conduct the election and to hold out the accountability of fulfilling the democratic course of. However until the state authorities initiates the method, the SEC stays a lame duck. Subsequently you’re responsibility certain in direction of the individuals of West Bengal in superintending course and conducting elections to all these municipalities and companies the place the tenure of the respective boards has expired. We request you to behave strongly to hold out your constitutional obligations of conducting free and truthful elections with out worry or favour, affection or ill-will.”